SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20335

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
V.Murthy – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner Vellore Municipal Corporation Vellore – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.Venkatasubban for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates
For the Respondent(s): Mr.P.S.Prabhu, SC for R1 and R2

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition. (Para 1)
2. court dismisses the petition as withdrawn. (Para 2)

ORDER

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has addressed a letter to the Registry, requesting the matter to be posted for withdrawal. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. In terms of the letter as well as the endorsement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top