Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
M/s.Sri Vaishnavi Constructions – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. compliance with planning approvals. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contentions on unlawful sealing. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's reasoning on unauthorized constructions. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
The writ petition is filed challenging the order dated 26.11.2025 of the 2nd respondent, whereby the appeal preferred under Section 80-A of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) came to be rejected.
2. According to the petitioner, the firm had purchased the property measuring an extent of 68,389.20 sq.ft. of agricultural land at Survey R.S.No.239/3 and 240/5, Hubbathalai Village, Coonoor Taluk, Nilgiris District, on 29.10.2018. In order to better utilise the property as a farmhouse, the petitioner’s firm had submitted building plan application for approval in the personal names of the partners of the petitioner, seeking for approval to construct two separate residential buildings.
3. The plan was aesthetically prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Hill Area Special Building Rules, 1981, r/w Tamil Nadu District Municipalities (Hill Stations) Building Rules, 1993. Necessary approvals of all the Department
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
