IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. SUBRAMANIAM, K. SURENDER, JJ
Mariammal W/o.Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Office Of The District Collector, Salem District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to land exchange rejection (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. exchange of land not an absolute right (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. eviction procedures for encroachment (Para 5) |
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.)
The order dated 15.08.2024, rejecting the claim of the petitioner for exchange of land is under challenge in the present writ petition.
2. The revenue authorities identified the encroachments in government lands and all the encroachers were evicted admittedly, except the petitioner who made an offer for exchange of land.
3. Learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the Government land under encroachment is a valuable land and the authorities have not entertained the offer made by the petitioner for exchange of land.
4. Exchange of land can never be claimed as an absolute right by the encroacher. The offer made by the petitioner was not considered by the Government. The Government, being the competent authority is to accept the exchange of land and mere recommendation by Tahsildar would not be of any avail to the petitioner to secure any orders in the present writ petition. That apart, the learned Additional Government Pleader would submit that the Gover
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.