SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Fazalur Rahaman Warshi – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector, Vellore District. – Respondent
Writ Petition | WMP.Nos.34883 & 34885 of 2018



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.AR.Karthik Lakshmanan
For the Respondents: Mr.C.Gauthamaraj, Mr.A.Maheshnath

The court addressed the removal of a gate placed illegally, affirming the responsibility of authorities to rectify such actions under Article 226.

Headnote:This Writ Petition files under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to quash the order dated 25/10/2018 in Mu.Mu.No.A6/3335/2018 of the 3rd Respondent concerning a gate erected by the 6th Respondent. The Government Advocate submitted that the gate was already removed as verified by the inspection photograph dated 06.03.2026. The Court found no further orders required as the request of the petitioner was already addressed, concluding the petition. 'This Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.'

Table of Content
1. challenge to an administrative order regarding illegal construction. (Para 1)
2. verification of compliance with the court's informal directive. (Para 2)
3. final disposition of the writ petition. (Para 3)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order of the 3rd respondent dated 25.10.2018 and consequently, direct the Respondents 1 to 5 to remove the Gate put up by the 6th respondent in S.No.16/2, Molagarampatti Village and Post, Thirupathur Taluk, Vellore District.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Government Advocate appearing for the 2nd respondent would submit that the gate put up by the 6th respondent had already been removed. After inspection, the photograph taken on 06.03.2026 at 01.32 p.m. has also been produced before this Court and it shows that the gate was removed.

3. In such being the case, no further order is required in this writ petition as the request of the petitioner has been considered already and the gate has been removed.

4 In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. It is made clear that if any private dispute is pending, this order will no way affect the rights of the parties to adjudicate the dispute before the Civil Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top