SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20478

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dr. G. Jayachandran, R. Sakthivel, JJ
S & S Power Switchgear Limited – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade (Enforcement-cum-Adjudication) Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce – Respondent
W.P.No.9305 of 2006



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. N. Prasad
For the Respondents: Mr. B. Rabu Manohar for R1 to R3

The court held a writ petition can be dismissed as withdrawn upon request from the petitioner's counsel, without imposing costs.

Headnote:The High Court examined the petitioner's request under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging the constitutionality of Section 13 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992. The court noted that the petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition, which was endorsed by legal counsel. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, setting no costs involved.

Table of Content
1. overview of writ petition and constitutional challenge. (Para 1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-03-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL W.P.No.9305 of 2006 S & S Power Switchgear Limited, represented by its Chief Manager-Legal & Secretarial, V.Ramachandran, III, Mount Poonamallee Road, Porur, Chennai 600 116. .. Petitioner /versus/

1.The Joint Director General of Foreign Trade (Enforcement-cum-Adjudication)

Government of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Office of the Zonal Joint Director General of Foreign Trade, 38-39, Whites Road, Royapettah, Chennai 600 014. 2.The Additional Director General of Foreign Trade, Government of India, Department of Commerce, Directorate General of Foreign Trade, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi 110 011.

3.Union of India, Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Department of Commerce, Udyog Bhavan, New Delhi 110 011. .. Respondents Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring that Section 13 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992 as ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 265 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, 1950 and hence, void ab initio.

For Petitioner :Mr.N.Prasad For Respondents :Mr.B.Rabu Manohar for R1 to R3 --------------

ORDER The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top