IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Vidya Iyer – Appellant
Versus
Kishore V.A.S – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of maintenance application without due consideration (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against continuation of proceedings (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's decision to set aside lower court's order (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.2 of 2023 in O.P.No.2433 of 2021 by the learned V Principal Judge, Family Court, Chennai, the Revision Petitioner/Respondent preferred this Civil Revision Petition. 2. Before the trial court, the Revision Petitioner filed an application under Sec.24 of the Hindu Marriage Act seeking a direction to the respondent to pay a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- per month to the minor daughter. When the matter was taken up for enquiry before the trial court, she was not present and she was not ready for enquiry, which was pending for more than one year. Therefore, the trial judge had observed that she was not inclined to contest the application and only to drag on the proceedings unnecessarily, she had filed the said application. Accordingly, it was dismissed. Aggrieved over the said findings, the Revision Petitioner/Respondent preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
3.The learned counsel for Revision Petitioner would submit that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.