Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J
Maria Vinoth Robinston – Appellant
Versus
ArulMary W/o Francis Xavier – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's role in child custody disputes. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. application for custodial rights post parent's death. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's directive for child custody resolution. (Para 5) |
ORDER
Challenging the impugned order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in G.W.O.P.No. 8 of 2024 by the learned Principal District Judge, Coimbatore, the Revision Petitioner/petitioner preferred this Civil Revision Petition.
2. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on the side of respondents.
3. Before the trial court, the Revision Petitioner filed an application under Sec.12 of Guardian and Wards Act to grant interim custody of minor child to the only legal guardian, Petitioner from the respondents for three days (Friday to Sunday) in every week till the disposal of the main petition and the same was granted in favour of the petitioner. Now, the Revision Petitioner had challenged the said order stating that he wanted to have permanent custody of the child.
4. The learned counsel for Revision Petitioner would submit that already mother of child died due to some natural illness and the respondents are his father-in-law and mother-in-law, but as on date, the child is with the custody
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
