Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
SHANMUGAM – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE REP BY ITS, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BARUR POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions filed to quash (Para 1) |
| 2. prosecution claims and allegations (Para 2) |
| 3. non-appearance of second respondent (Para 3) |
| 4. court's assessment of unlawful assembly (Para 4) |
| 5. court’s ruling on quashing proceedings (Para 5) |
COMMON ORDER
These criminal original petitions have been filed to quash the proceedings in STC.No.4 of 2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Pochampalli
2. The case of the prosecution is that the accused trespassed into the property of the second respondent and abused her with filthy languages and also threatened with dire consequences. They also damaged the fencing worth about Rs.2,000/-. On receipt of the said complaint, the first respondent registered FIR in crime No.478 of 2020 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 427, 441, 506(i) of IPC. After completion of investigation, final report was filed and the same was taken cognizance by the trial court for the charges under Sections 147, 148, 294(b), 427, 441, 506(i) of IPC.
3. Though the second respondent received notice, no one appeared before this Court either by party or through pleader.
4. Admittedly all the accused persons are same family members and their la
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
