SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20542

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
Soundarajan Sivasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Chief General Manager IDBI Bank Ltd. – Respondent



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.L.Chandrakumar
For the Respondents: Mr.N.Vignesh

The court determined that the petitioner's claim for retrospective promotion lacked merit, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition.

Headnote:This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution sought a writ of Mandamus for promotion as Caretaker Grade-II in the 2020-2021 vacancy. The respondents stated there was no merit in the claim for retrospective promotion. The court concluded that nothing survives for adjudication and disposed of the petition. The final outcome being the writ petition is stands disposed of.

Table of Content
1. promotion request under review. (Para 1)
2. claim lacked merit. (Para 2)
3. petition disposed of. (Para 3)

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Caretaker Grade-II in the 2020-2021 vacancy based on the Rules and that of the Memorandum of Settlement on promotional avenues in respect of Workmen in Class-III Cadre.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Vignesh

ORDER

The writ petition is filed praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Caretaker Grade-II in the 2020-2021 vacancy based on the Rules and that of the Memorandum of Settlement on promotional avenues in respect of Workmen in Class-III Cadre.

2. Today, the learned counsel for respondents circulated a communication from IDBI, wherein it has been stated as under:

" The Bank has carefully examined your representation dated November 18, 2022 to consider your promotion to caretaker with retrospective effect and does not found any merits to consider it with effect from August 01, 2020."

3. In view thereof, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top