Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J
Soundarajan Sivasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Chief General Manager IDBI Bank Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. promotion request under review. (Para 1) |
| 2. claim lacked merit. (Para 2) |
| 3. petition disposed of. (Para 3) |
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Caretaker Grade-II in the 2020-2021 vacancy based on the Rules and that of the Memorandum of Settlement on promotional avenues in respect of Workmen in Class-III Cadre.
For Petitioner(s): Mr.L.Chandrakumar For Respondent(s): Mr.N.Vignesh
ORDER
The writ petition is filed praying for a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to forthwith consider the claim of the petitioner for promotion as Caretaker Grade-II in the 2020-2021 vacancy based on the Rules and that of the Memorandum of Settlement on promotional avenues in respect of Workmen in Class-III Cadre.
2. Today, the learned counsel for respondents circulated a communication from IDBI, wherein it has been stated as under:
" The Bank has carefully examined your representation dated November 18, 2022 to consider your promotion to caretaker with retrospective effect and does not found any merits to cons
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
