Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Susila – Appellant
Versus
State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector of Police, Thideer Nagar Police Station Madurai District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts of compromise between parties. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. court's view on proceeding with the criminal case. (Para 8) |
| 3. resulting decision to quash the charges. (Para 10) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed by Accused Nos.1 and 2 seeking to quash the charge sheet in C.C. No. 270 of 2023 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. V, Madurai, wherein they are charged with offences under Sections 120(b), 406, 420, 468, 471, 506(i), and 34 of the IPC.
2. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, O.S. No.403 of
2018 was disposed of on the basis of a compromise entered into between the parties on 29.03.2022. As per the said compromise, the petitioners/accused received a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- from the de-facto complainant and agreed that they would not claim any right over the property. The petitioners, who were in occupation of the building, also vacated the premises and handed over possession to the de-facto complainant/landlord. These facts are not in dispute.
3. According to the learned Counsel for the petitioner, the documents alleged to have been forged by the petitioners herein formed part of the records before the C
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
