SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20610

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Rajkamal – Appellant
Versus
1. The Regional Passport Office, Madurai 2. The Superintendent Enquiry Officer, Regional Passport Office, Madurai 3. The Inspector of Police, Prohibition Enforcement Wing, Madurai City 4. The Inspector of Police, Mattuthavani Police Station, Madurai City 5. The Inspector of Police, Othakadai Police Station, Madurai – Respondent
Writ Petition | MD1066274045326



Advocates:
For the Petitioner: Mr.M.Chandrabose
For R1 & R2: Mr.K.Govindarajan DSGI
For R3 to R5:Mr.Vaikkam Karunanidhi Government Advocate (Crl.side)

The issuance of a passport can be denied if there are pending criminal proceedings against the applicant, requiring them to seek permission from the relevant court.

Headnote:The Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus for issuing a passport based on the petitioner's application. The court found that the application cannot be processed due to a pending criminal case against the petitioner, citing Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967. The court opined that the petitioner must seek permission from the jurisdictional criminal court before obtaining the passport. The Writ Petition was disposed of, allowing the petitioner to approach the criminal court for necessary permissions.

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus issuance based on application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. pending criminal proceedings affect passport issuance. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court permits approach for passport issuance permission. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 and 2 to issue a passport to the petitioner based on his application in File No.MD1066274045326 dated 28.01.2026 and the reply submitted by him on 13.02.2026.

2. The learned Deputy Solicitor General appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the petitioner’s application cannot be processed since a criminal case is pending against the petitioner before the jurisdictional criminal court. In support of the said submission, reliance has been placed on Section 6(2)(f) of the Passport Act, 1967, which empowers the Passport Authority to refuse issuance or renewal of a passport if proceedings in respect of an offence alleged to have been committed by the applicant are pending before a criminal court in India.

3. The learned Deputy Solicitor General further placed reliance on the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.9418 of 2025 dated 07.04.2025, wherein it has been held that when criminal proceedings are pending before a competent criminal court, the applicant seeking issuance or renewal of a passport must approach the court in which such proceedings are pending and obtain appropriate permission for issuance of the passport. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the said legal position has been reiterated by a Full Bench of this Court in W.P.(MD) No.26547 of 2025 dated

09.02.2026.

4. In view of the above settled legal position, this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner must necessarily approach the jurisdictional criminal court where the criminal proceedings are pending and seek appropriate permission for issuance of the passport.

5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional criminal court before which the criminal case is pending and file an appropriate application seeking permission for issuance of the passport. If such an application is filed by the petitioner, the concerned trial court shall consider the same on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The trial court shall not reject the application on mere technical grounds and shall consider the same in the light of the legal principles governing the field.

6. With the above observations and directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top