Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Thirumalaikumar – Appellant
Versus
Peruma represented by her power agent Premkumar. – Respondent
C.R.P(MD)Nos.697 and 698 of 2023|C.M.P(MD)No.3245 of 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.A.Balakrishnan
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Nallathambi

Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous due to prior decree; petitioner may invoke procedural grounds if aggrieved.

Headnote:The case involved Civil Revision Petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution concerning orders made in a long-standing suit. The court recognized that the suit had been decreed, leaving no revival necessary for the petition. Upon consideration, the petitions were dismissed as infructuous. The court concluded that the petitioner has the liberty to invoke relevant provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure if aggrieved by the orders.

Table of Content
1. revision petitioner acknowledges decree rendered. (Para 1)
2. court dismisses petitions as infructuous. (Para 2)

COMMON ORDER

Mr.D.Nallathambi, learned counsel representing the revision petitioner states that the suit itself has been decreed on 29.8.2025. As the suit itself has been decreed, there is nothing for this Court to revive. In case, the Petitioner is still aggrieved of the order impugned in this revision, it is open to the Civil Revision Petitioner to make it as a ground invoking Section 105(1) of Code of Civil Procedure .

2.With the above liberty, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20620

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASV.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JThirumalaikumar – AppellantVersusPeruma represented by her power agent Premkumar. – RespondentC.R.P(MD)Nos.697 and 698 of 2023|C.M.P(MD)No.3245 of 2023

Civil Revision Petitions dismissed as infructuous due to prior decree; petitioner may invoke procedural grounds if aggrieved.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Thirumalaikumar – Appellant
Versus
Peruma represented by her power agent Premkumar. – Respondent
C.R.P(MD)Nos.697 and 698 of 2023|C.M.P(MD)No.3245 of 2023