Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
K.Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowment Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for writ of certiorarified mandamus regarding the temple management. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. claims of hereditary trusteeship of the petitioner and related appointments. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. discussion on the status of the temple and prior legal findings. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's assessment of temple status under the h.r.& c.e. act. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. final ruling on the dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 11) |
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the proceedings of the third respondent dated 28.07.2021 in Nada.Na.Ka.No.2218/2021/A3 and to quash the same, and consequently to call for the records pertaining impugned communication / order dated 01.03.2022 by the fourth respondent and quash the same.
2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that Arulmigu Chockanachiamman Temple situated at No.592 of No.18, Vempathy “B” Village, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District is believed to be in existence for more than 100 years and was founded by the petitioner’s ancestors and was maintained by them and for more than three generations, the idol of the said Temple i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
