Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
Veerajothi Lakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Shajahan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. parties are generally identified and an overview of the case context is provided. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court acknowledges the parties' legal representation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court assessed the procedural aspects regarding court fees and application timelines. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court concludes dismissal of the petition upholding procedural integrity. (Para 8 , 9) |
O R D E R
The defendants 1 to 3 are the civil revision petitioners. For the sake of convenience, parties shall be referred to as per their rank in the suit.
2. The plaintiffs presented O.S.No.3 of 2021 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge at Mudhukulathur seeking multiple reliefs of declaration, injunction, recovery of possession and mandatory injunction. Summons were served on the defendants. Amongst other pleas, the defendants also took a plea that the suit was bad for under valuation. The learned Trial Judge framed issues in the suit on 27.04.2022. It is not in dispute across the bar that one of the issues relates to the valuation of the suit.
3. The plaintiffs entered the witness box on 12.08.2022 and commenced his examination. A year and a month thereafter, the defendants 1 to 3 filed an application se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
