SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20713

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR, J
Shafny Reshiah – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer, Ministry of External Affairs – Respondent
Writ Petition | W.P.(MD) No. 2119 of 2026 | WMP(MD) No. 1681 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.T.Ramesh Raja
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Veluchamy, CGSC

The requirement for both parents' consent for a minor's passport issuance can be waived under specific circumstances involving custody disputes.

Headnote:The Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus seeking to quash an impugned communication requiring consent of both parents for issuing a passport to a minor child. The facts state that the petitioner and the respondent are spouses with a strained relationship, and custody of their minor child is pending adjudication. The court directed the passport authority to consider the application without insisting on consent from the second respondent in line with prior guidelines in similar cases. The issue framed was whether consent of both parents is required for a passport application when custodial arrangements exist. The court held the authority must process the application without joint consent provided an affidavit is submitted. The petition was disposed of directing the first respondent to process the passport application in accordance with law within a stipulated time frame.

Table of Content
1. court's procedural direction to issue passport without dual parental consent. (Para 1 , 2)
2. importance of prior case guidelines on minor passport issuance. (Para 3)
3. court's directive based on guidance and urgency of application handling. (Para 4 , 5)

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the communication dated 06.12.2025 issued by the first respondent and to quash the same, and consequently direct the first respondent to process the petitioner’s application for issuance of a passport in favour of the petitioner’s minor son.

2.The petitioner and the second respondent are legally wedded husband and wife. However, it is stated that there is a strained relationship between them. A petition in GWOP No.725 of 2025 has been filed before the jurisdictional Court seeking custody of the minor son and the same is pending adjudication. The petitioner had submitted an application before the first respondent seeking issuance of a passport in favour of the minor son. However, by the impugned communication dated 06.12.2025, the petitioner has been called upon to furnish the consent of both the parents, namely the petitioner and the second respondent, for issuance of the passport to the minor child.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner placed reliance on the decision of a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.(MD) No. 20823 of 2024 dated 14.11.2024, wherein at paragraph No.7 it has been observed that guidelines have been issued regarding the procedure to be followed in cases where the consent of both parents cannot be obtained for issuance of a passport to a minor child. As per the said guidelines, if the applicant parent files an affidavit in the form prescribed in Annexure ‘C’ of Schedule III of the Passport Rules, 1980, the Passport Issuing Authority can issue a passport to the minor child without insisting upon the consent of both the parents. It has further been held that even if one of the parents refuses to give consent, the Passport Authority is bound to process the application and issue the passport to the minor, provided the affidavit in Annexure ‘C’ is submitted.

4. In the light of the above decision, this Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the petitioner’s application for issuance of a passport to the petitioner’s minor son without insisting for the consent of Respondent No.2 , and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. It is stated by the petitioner that the minor son is presently in the custody of the petitioner. However, the petitioner shall abide by any order that may be passed by the jurisdictional Court in the pending proceedings in GWOP No.725 of 2025 relating to the custody of the minor child.

6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top