IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. DHANABAL, J
E.Padma – Appellant
Versus
E.Thennarasu – Respondent
Civil Suit | C.S. No.228 of 2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the suit filed for partition and cost. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. plaintiff's withdrawal permissible despite earlier undertaking. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. the suit is dismissed as 'withdrawn'. (Para 7) |
JUDGMENT
The Civil Suit has been filed for the reliefs of partition and cost.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff requested permission of the Court to withdraw this Suit in C.S. No.228 of 2021 and to that effect, he has also made his endorsement. However, the learned counsel appearing for the defendants strongly objected to withdraw the Suit and brought to the notice of the Court that already the same Plaintiff made an undertaking before this Court that she would not withdraw the Suit and now contrary to the said undertaking made by her, seeking permission to withdraw the Suit. Already the defendants have filed an application to transpose them as Plaintiffs in the Suit and those applications were disposed of, since the Plaintiff would not withdraw the Suit and therefore, strongly objected.
4. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
5. On a perusal of records, it is observed that the Plaintiff in C.S. No.228 of 2021 has filed the Suit in respect of a single property, whereas the son of the Plaintiff has filed the Suit in C.S.No.226 of 2021 by including all the properties including the subject matter of the property in this Suit. Therefore, once the Plaintiff herself wanted to withdraw the Suit which is filed only for a single property, whereas the comprehensive Suit in C.S.No.226 of 2021 is pending for partition, in respect of the entire family properties, which includes the subject matter of the Suit property in the said pending Suit in C.S. No.226 of 2021, the parties can work out their remedies and therefore, there would be no prejudice caused to either side by permitting the Plaintiff to withdraw the Suit. Once the comprehensive suit filed for partition is pending the present suit filed by the plaintiff is only in respect of one item of property covered under the suit in CS No.226 of 2021, the suit need not be kept pending unnecessarily. Further the plaintiff who is the dominus litus can withdraw the suit as her wish and the defendants cannot have any objection. Though the suit is for partition all the parties can be treated as plaintiffs, since the suit property is covered under earlier suit in CS No.226 of 2021 which is filed for partition by including all the family members, it is appropriate to permit the plaintiff to withdraw the suit.
6. In view of the same, this Court is of the opinion that the earlier undertaking given by the Plaintiff that not to withdraw the Suit is noway an impediment to grant permission to the Plaintiff to withdraw the Suit. Therefore, this Court is inclined to permit the Plaintiff to withdraw the Suit.
7. Accordingly, this Suit is dismissed as ‘withdrawn’ and the Plaintiff is entitled to refund of Court fee as per rules.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.