Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20835

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
K.A.Padmakumar, T.Margathampillai, Muthusamy Naiker, S.Ganesanudayar, A.Sivasubramanian, K.Sekaran – Appellant
Versus
P.Vadivel, The Revenue Divisional Officer Coimbatore South, The Tahsildhar Madukarai Taluk, Assistant Commissioner of Police Pothanur Circle, The Inspector of Police Pothanur Police Station, The Inspector of Police Sundarapuram Police Station – Respondent
W.P.M.P.(Crl.) No.235 of 2025 in Review Appln.SR.No.46279 of 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: No Appearance
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Review applications require sufficient representation; absence leads to dismissal especially when compliance is confirmed.

Headnote:This Miscellaneous Petition seeks leave for third-party Review Applicants to review an order in W.P.No.302 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025. The petitioner had no representation, and the government advocate stated that the order in question was complied with, leading the court to close the Miscellaneous Petition. The court's conclusion was that the Review Application was also closed due to lack of presentation, as the issues in the order were resolved.

Table of Content
1. grounds for filing review applications. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court notice of compliance and lack of representation. (Para 3)
3. conclusion of the court to close the applications. (Para 4)

(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.)

This Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to grant leave in favour of the third-party/Review Applicants to file the review application to review the order passed in W.P.No.302 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025.

2. Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that the order of this Court dated 16.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.302 of 2025 was already duly complied with and there is nothing survives for adjudication and thereby, the petitioner has not appeared for the past two hearings.

4. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), this Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Consequently, the Review Application in Review Appln.S.R.No.46279 of 2025 is also closed at the SR Stage itself.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document