Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
R.Selthilkumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Additional Chief Secretary to Government, Environment, Climate Change and Forest Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks regularization of service. (Para 1) |
| 2. details of petitioner's service history. (Para 2) |
| 3. court discusses the requirement to challenge previous orders. (Para 3) |
| 4. writ petitions dismissed; petitioners may seek other legal routes. (Para 4) |
Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records which culminated in issuing in G.O.(2D).No.202, Environment, Climate Change and Forest (FR.2(ii)) Department dated 25.11.2025 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same with consequential direction to the respondents to notionally regularize the petitioners service by relaxing the rules after completion of ten years from the date of initial appointment as a Plot Watcher on daily wage basis on par with Junior Namely Mr.M.Karunanidhi seniority along with regular service as qualifying service for the purpose of getting pension and family pension in the light of Hon’ble Supreme Court Judgment delivered in C.A.No.6798 of 2019 dated 02.09.2019 and Hon’ble Madras High Court orders passed in W.P.No.21627 of 2021 dated 07.10.2021, W.P.(MD) No.15339 of 2024 dated 10.07.2024, W
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
