The court mandated timely consideration of a petitioner's representation without evaluating the merits of the case, ensuring adherence to procedural fairness.

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Ravi ...Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District, Thanjavur.

2. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by the Inspector of Police, Peravurani Police Station, Thanjvur District.

3. Tamilarasi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 1^st respondent to instruct the 2^nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2026 and to conduct a fair investigation in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramana For Respondents : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.side)

(R1 & R2)

ORDER

This writ petition is filed for Writ of Mandamus to direct the 1^st respondent to instruct the 2^nd respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's representation dated 21.01.2026 and to conduct a fair investigation in accordance with law.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents 1 and 2.

3. This Court, without going into the merits of the case, directing the

1^st respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 21.01.2026 and pass appropriate orders within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order.

4. With these observations, this Writ Petition (Criminal) is disposed of.