SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 20989

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
B.PUGALENDHI, J
A.Antony Sahaya Mary – Appellant
Versus
The Director of Public Health and Preventive Medicine – Respondent
WMP(MD)No.4710 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.H.Mohammed Imran for M/s.Ajmal Associates
For the Respondents: Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

The court emphasizes the obligation of government establishments to provide reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities.

Headnote:The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, mandates that employees with disabilities receive reasonable accommodation. The petitioner, a physically challenged laboratory technician, seeks transfer to a health center close to her native place. The court directs consideration of her request per government guidelines within ten days.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's request for accommodation due to disability. (Para 1 , 2)
2. obligation of government to consider requests as per legal guidelines. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's directive for sympathetic consideration of the petitioner's case. (Para 6)

ORDER

The petitioner is working as a Laboratory Technician at Chathirapatti, Ottanchathiram Block. She is a physically challenged person, having 60% disability. The petitioner's native is Batlagundu and her family members are also residing at Batlagundu and she is having two children aged about 5 and 9 years old. Therefore, she submitted a representation to the respondents, seeking to accommodate her in any one of the Primary Health Centres near Batlagundu, so that, it would be convenient for her to discharge her duty effectively. Since the petitioner's request has not been considered, she has filed this writ petition seeking a writ of mandamus.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, by referring to the Government Letter dated 22.07.2009, submits that the Government has issued certain guidelines for accommodating persons with disability, to their native place for their effective services. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, the petitioner shall be accommodated in a nearby place. According to the petitioner, there is a vacancy at the Primary Health Centre, S.Thummalapatti, Dindigul.

3. The learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents and submits that the vacancy at the Primary Health Centre, S.Thummalapatti, Dindigul, arises only on 18.02.2026. Since the vacancy arises recently, the respondents would consider the case of the petitioner.

4. This Court considered the rival submissions and perused the materials.

5. Admittedly, the petitioner is physically challenged with 60%

locomotor disability. The Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, was introduced with the object of ensuring full and effective participation of persons with disabilities in society. Therefore, provisions have to be made so that employees with disabilities are accommodated in government establishments. Section 20(2) of the Act provides that employees with disabilities should be provided reasonable accommodation and reads as under:

“(2) Every Government establishment shall provide reasonable accommodation and appropriate barrier free and conducive environment to employees with disabilities.”

6. Further, Section 20(5) of the 2016 Act provides that the appropriate Government may frame policies regarding the posting and transfer of employees with disabilities. In line with the provisions of the Act, the Chief Secretary of Tamil Nadu has framed guidelines regarding the transfer of physically challenged persons in Letter (Ms)No.92/S/09 dated 22.07.2009 which reads as under:

“3(i) Physically Challenged Government Servants in all Groups viz, A, B, C and D shall be posted near to their native places wherever possible.....”

6. In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner sympathetically and take a decision as per the guidelines issued in the Government Letter (Ms) No.92/S/09, dated 22.07.2009, within a period of ten days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top