Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Tamilselvan – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by The Inspector Police, All Women Police Station, Pennagaram, Dharmapuri District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case's context and compromise. (Para 1 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. argument on the implications of quashing based on compromise. (Para 3) |
| 3. court's considerations on societal impact and justice. (Para 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. final ruling and conditions imposed. (Para 10 , 14) |
O R D E R
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.264 of 2025, pending on the file of the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the petitioners and the victim girl.
2. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record.
3. Based on the complaint given by the 2nd respondent, a case in Crime No.15 of 2025 was registered on the file of the 1st respondent/ Police against the petitioners and on completion of investigation, a final report was filed before the Special Court for Exclusive Trial of Cases, under the POCSO Act, Dharmapuri and the same was made over to the Fast Track Mahila Court, Dharmapuri, for the offences under Sections 366 of the Indian Penal Code,1860, 9 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 and 5(l), 5(j)(ii), 6(1) and 21(1) of the Pr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
