Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
F.Aaskar – Appellant
Versus
R.Thejasri – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed to quash fir based on compromise. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. compromise reached; marriage registered. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. assessment of public and individual interests in quashing. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. decision to quash based on individual nature of offences. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling to quash the fir. (Para 10 , 11) |
ORDER
The present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No.648 of 2025 pending on the file of the first respondent, on the basis of the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and the victim/ third respondent.
2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
3. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/de facto complainant, the aforesaid case in Crime No.648 of 2025 was registered on the file of the first respondent Police against the petitioner, for the offences under Sections 69, 75(1)(i), 75(2), 79 and 351(2) of the BNS and Sections 66E and 67 of the Information Technology Act r/w Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002.
4. The submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner are as follows:-
4.1. Subsequent to the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
