Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Chozan – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Anakavoor Police Station, Tiruvannamalai District – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing of criminal original petition to quash fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 5) |
| 2. arguments on innocence and quashing of fir. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's reasoning regarding the sufficiency of fir allegations. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. final ruling on the quashing of fir. (Para 9) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the FIR in Crime No.324 of 2023 dated 29.08.2023 for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 143, 294(b), 353, 506(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Public Property (Prevention of Damage and Loss) Act, 1992.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and other persons conducted demonstration against the acquisition of agricultural land for the SIPCOT Industry project at Melma to Erumaivetti Road, without any permission from the respondent police. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Without any base, the first respondent police registered a case in Crime No.324 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 147, 341, 143, 294(b), 353, 506(i) of the Indian P
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
