Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J
R.Vignesh – Appellant
Versus
UCO Bank K.K.Nagar Branch Through its Manager – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to execution order based on prior sale. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. procedural requirements for attachment of property. (Para 3) |
| 3. importance of notification in property rights during execution. (Para 4 , 6) |
| 4. court observations on execution rights and jurisdiction. (Para 5 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. conclusion on invalidity of attachment without due process. (Para 11) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 26.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR CRP(MD).Nos.3846 to 3850 of 2025 and 162 to 165 & 284 of 2026 and CMP(MD) Nos.20254, 20256, 20258, 20263 and 20267 of 2025 &
1209, 469, 651, 652 and 653 of 2026 R.Vignesh ... Petitioner in all CRPs., Vs.
1.UCO Bank K.K.Nagar Branch Through its Manager Plot No.651 Eighty feet road K.K.Nagar Madurai.
2.R.Pretha
3.R.Sujitha ... Respondents in all CRPs., COMMON PRAYER :-Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decretal order 24-07-2025 passed in E.P.Nos.220, 118, 221, 223, 20, 22 and 44 of 2023 and 219 & 222 of 2022 in O.S.Nos.21 & 37 of 2009, 1209 of 2008, 57, 43, 101, 371, 265 and 267 of 2009 respectively on the file of the 1st Additional Distric
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
