Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
M/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Greater Chennai corporation – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.Sachin Menon for M/s Tatva Legal Chennai
For the Respondents: Ms.P.T.Ramadevi Standing Counsel for RR 1 to 3, Mr.B.Sanjay Balachandran Standing Counsel (CMDA) for R4

Compliance with procedural rules is essential in property management and redevelopment matters.

Headnote:The court considers the petitioners' request for demolition permission for the Rams Pinnacle Apartment complex, noting the failure to comply with Rule 9 of the Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Rules, 2024. The court finds that the petitioner must hold a Special General Body meeting and communicate the resolution to the CMDA, highlighting procedural adherence as essential. The key issue revolved around whether the application for demolition could proceed without full powers of attorney from all apartment owners. The court ultimately ruled that the petition, while dismissed as withdrawn, permits adherence to the rules provided. No costs are awarded.

ORDER

This Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to strictly comply with the provisions of Rule 9 of the Tamil Nadu Apartment Ownership Rules, 2024. The petitioner shall hold a Special General Body meeting, after due notice to all the occupants. In case, a resolution for re-development is passed, it is at liberty to communicate the same to the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) by way of “Form I”. Once “Form I” is submitted, the Board of Managers shall inform all the house owners regarding the filing of the same and produce the acknowledgement thereof before the Chief Planner. In case, no objections are filed before the Chief Planner, it is up to him to take a call on the request made in the Special General Body meeting.

2.With this liberty, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21102

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASV. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JM/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association – AppellantVersusThe Commissioner Greater Chennai corporation – Respondent

Compliance with procedural rules is essential in property management and redevelopment matters.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
M/s. Rams Pinnacle Apartment Association – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner Greater Chennai corporation – Respondent