Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
Murugesan Senthil – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. condonation of delay in tax return filing (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. response time from respondents required (Para 4) |
| 3. final ruling on writ petition (Para 5) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 26.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY Murugesan Senthil ... Petitioner Vs
1. The Secretary, Central Board of Direct Taxes, Department of Revenue of Income Tax (OSD) (OT and WT), Ministry of Finance, Jeevan Vihar Building, New Delhi.
2. The Principle Chief Commission of Income Tax, Tamilnadu and Puducherry, Room No 107, Mahatma Gandhi Road, Chennai 600 034.
4. Office of Income Tax Officer, Ward II, Tuticorin. ... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the
2nd respondent to consider the condone delay application of the petitioner filed under section 119 (2)(b) of the Income Tax Act in the light of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).NO.5159 of 2025 dated 26.02.2025 on merits and in accordance with law and condone the delay of 62 days in filing the income tax returns by the petitioner for the Assessment year 2020-2021 and treat the re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
