SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21188

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J
Deerthavalli – Appellant
Versus
M. Maria Arul Rajan – Respondent
C.M.P. No.3486 of 2026 | CMA Sr. No.201770 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.F. Terry Chella Raja for Mr.V. Velu

A petition for condonation of delay was dismissed as withdrawn based on the petitioner's request.

Headnote:This Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, sought to condone a delay of 602 days in appealing an Award. The Court, upon hearing, noted the endorsement for withdrawal by the petitioners. Ultimately, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn, leading to the rejection of the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in SR stage.

Table of Content
1. petition filed under the motor vehicles act to condone delay. (Para 1)
2. court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. (Para 2)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

1. Deerthavalli

2. Murugesan …Petitioners Vs.

1. M. Maria Arul Rajan

2. The Manager, Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, T.P. Cell, No.6, Reliance House, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 006. …Respondents Prayer in C.M.P. No.3486 of 2026: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, to condone the delay of 602 days in filing the appeal against the Award dated 26.09.2023 made in M.A.C.T.O.P. No.1020 of 2018 on the file of the II Court of Small Causes, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai.

For Petitioners : Mr.F. Terry Chella Raja for Mr.V. Velu

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Miscellaneous Petition. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. In view of the above, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal in SR stage is rejected.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top