Back
Next 
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21291
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.DHANDAPANI, J
S.B.Yasin – Appellant
Versus
The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Power Distribution Corporation Ltd – Respondent
WMP NOs. 6647, 6648 and 6649 2026
Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.R.Muralikrishnan
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Rajkumar for TNEB
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.R.Muralikrishnan
For the Respondents: Mr.K.Rajkumar for TNEB
Withdrawal of petition permissible; further legal remedy allowed.
Headnote:This Court analyzed the petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order and seeking to evolve a methodology to promote Diploma holders from Distance education. The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue remedies in law after dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. The primary issue was whether the representation should be considered and the existing agenda quashed. The Court framed the issue around the legality and adherence to procedural requirements regarding qualifications. The reasoning determined the withdrawal's permissibility and affirmed opportunities for further legal recourse. The case concludes with an open door for the petitioner's remedies.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. withdrawal of petition by appellant. (Para 1) |
| 2. court grants liberty for further remedies. (Para 2) |
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and to that effect, he has made an endorsement in the bundle.
2. Recording the above submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.
