SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21314

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
M/s. Karthick Tiffin Centre (R.V. Caters) – Appellant
Versus
The State represented by The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police – Respondent
WP.MP.Crl No.842 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.C.K.M. Appaji
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Vinoth Kumar Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

The court clarifies responsibilities regarding traffic management concerning eateries and enforces lawful conduct in public areas.

Headnote:This Writ Petition (Criminal) seeks a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner, running an eatery, claims interference from the respondents due to traffic issues caused by customer parking. The court acknowledges past orders directing police vigilance for eatery operations but notes that the petitioner lacks parking arrangements, leading to disturbances. The court emphasizes that the respondents are not obstructing the business, clarifying actions taken to maintain order. The petition stands closed with directions for lawful actions against traffic disturbances.

Table of Content
1. writ petition overview and background. (Para 1 , 2)
2. conclusion and court directives regarding lawful actions. (Para 3 , 4)

O R D E R

This Writ Petition (Criminal) has been filed seeking to forbear the respondents from interfering with the petitioner’s running of eatery named M/s. Karthick Tiffin Centre (R.V.Caters) functioning at No.C-44, 2nd Avenue, 12th Main Road, Anna Nagar, Chennai- 600 040 during late night hours.

2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondents are not preventing the petitioner from running the shop; since the petitioner has not made any arrangements to their customers to sit and eat, they are parking their vehicles haphazardly, thereby, causing disturbance of the flow of traffic. He would further submit that though this Court, in WP.No.10512 of 2018 vide order dated 03.02.2022, have directed the police authorities to be vigilant and take earnest safety measures at all times and ensure that no law and order problem would arise, so that the eatery shops/hotels/restaurants can function peacefully without any interruption and this Court also directed the police authorities to take action in accordance with law in the event of owners of the eatery shops/hotels/restaurants found to be indulging in any illegal or prohibited activities, the petitioner has not provided any parking space to their customers, which resulted in chaos in the locality and hence, the respondent police are taking action only to clear the traffic and other than that, they are not interfering in the business of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner will ensure that unnecessary parking is not be done in that area.

4. Recording the submission of both the parties, this petition stands closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. However, liberty is granted to the respondents to take action in accordance with law in the event of customers of the petitioner causing disturbance to the traffic. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top