SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21317

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
Muruganantham – Appellant
Versus
1.The State of Tamilnadu rep. by its, The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Thillai Nagar, Tirchy – Respondent
Writ Petition



Important Points

The court affirms the obligation of authorities to address and conclude inquiries into complaints in a timely manner.

Subject

Administrative Law - Writ Petition

Headnote

This Writ Petition is submitted under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to consider the complaint dated 17.11.2025. The Court directs the respondents to pass orders in accordance with the law within four weeks. The petition is disposed with no order as to costs.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.N.Ananda Kumar
For the Respondents:Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

Table of Content
1. writ of mandamus issuance to direct inquiry. (Para 1)
2. court directs timely action on the complaint. (Para 2)

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to conduct enquiry on petitioner's complaint dated 17.11.2025 and to conclude the enquiry.

2. This Court without expressing any opinion on merits is directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's complaint, dated 17.11.2025 and pass orders in accordance to law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

3.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

There shall be no order as to costs.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top