SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21347

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Mansoor Rasiya Begam – Appellant
Versus
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.P.R.Prithiviraj
For the Respondents:Mr.M.Senthil Ayyanar, Government Advocate

The court affirmed the right to appeal against administrative decisions related to legal heir certifications, emphasizing timely consideration irrespective of limitations.

Headnote:The case involves a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Mandamus for cancellation of a legal heir certificate dated 31.01.2014. The petitioner contended that her husband was omitted as a legal heir due to his prior death. The court found the representation by the petitioner valid, directing the third respondent to consider it as an appeal, including all parties in the inquiry and enabling the appeal without limitation constraints, to be concluded within twelve weeks.

Result: 'There shall be no order as to costs.'

Table of Content
1. writ petition initiation. (Para 1)
2. grounds for the petition. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's direction on considering appeal. (Para 4)
4. conclusion with costs directive. (Para 5)

O R D E R

The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking a mandamus directing the third respondent to cancel the legal heir certificate issued on 31.01.2014 by the fourth respondent.

2. According to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, her father-in-law passed away on 02.10.2013 leaving behind her husband, Late Jabbar Ali, and other legal heirs. While issuing the legal heir certificate for the death of her father-in-law, the name of the petitioner's husband was not included on the ground that he had already passed away.

3. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation to the first respondent seeking cancellation of the said legal heir certificate and the same was forwarded to the third respondent. Since no action has been taken on the said representation, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

4. Considering the above facts, the third respondent is directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner by treating the same as an appeal and, after issuing notice to all the interested parties, pass orders on merits and in accordance with law. Since the petitioner came to know about the issuance of the legal heir certificate belatedly, the appeal shall be entertained on merits without reference to the period of limitation. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. With the above said observations, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top