SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21368

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
I.Ismail – Appellant
Versus
The Inspector General of Registration, Department of Registration, Chits and Societies, Santhome High Road, Pattinapakkam, Chennai – Respondent
Writ Petition|W.P(MD).Nos.6194 and 12016 of 2025



Important Points

Withdrawal of writ petition is permitted without cost implications.

Subject

Writ Jurisdiction - Withdrawal of Writ

Act Referred

Headnote

This case involves a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash a notice issued by the second respondent on grounds of illegality and lack of jurisdiction. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was subsequently granted, leading to the dismissal of the petition. The court noted that there would be no costs awarded. The final conclusion of the court stated, 'There shall be no order as to costs.'

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.V.Meenakshi Sundaram
For the Respondents: Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan, Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioners has circulated a letter dated

23.02.2026 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

Accordingly, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top