Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.Victoria Gowri, J
Rameesh @ Mohamed Rameesh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for quashing an fir under criminal procedure. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. parties reached an amicable agreement. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. legal principles for quashing fir based on compromise. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. assessment of the nature of dispute and its implications on society. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. the final ruling on the petitioners' application. (Para 10) |
ORDER
This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 CrPC /
Section 528 BNSS, seeking to quash the First Information Report in Crime No. 41 of 2018 on the file of the 1st respondent Police Station, insofar as the petitioners are concerned.
2. The prosecution case is that on 15.03.2018 at about 11.00 p.m., while the defacto complainant was returning home along with his employee after closing his hotel at Devipattinam Bazaar, the accused persons allegedly abused him in filthy language, assaulted him and kicked him, causing internal injuries, and also stole a sum of Rs. 32,050/- from his vehicle. Based on the said allegations, F.I.R. in Crime No.41 of 2018 was registered on the file of the 1st respondent police for the offence under Sections 296(b), 323, 379 and 506(1) IPC.
3. Admittedly, the petitioner and the 2nd responden
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
