Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Senthilkumar, J
A.Mohana Packia Rani – Appellant
Versus
R.Rathakrishnan @ Raja – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. request for appointment of advocate commissioner. (Para 3 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments about the application for evidence collection. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. final ruling on the petition. (Para 8) |
O R D E R
The present Civil Revision Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order passed by the learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.310 of 2024.
2.Heard Mr.M.P.Senthil, learned Counsel for the petitioner, Mr.K.Adithya @ Ayyanar, learned Counsel for the first respondent and Mr.F.Deepak, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 2 to 4.
3.The petitioner is the plaintiff in the suit in O.S.No.310 of 2024 before the II Additional Subordinate Court at Nagercoil. The respondent are the defendants in the suit. The said suit was filed for mandatory injunction and for other reliefs. During the pendency of the suit, the petitioner herein has filed an application in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.310 of 2024 under Order 26 Rule 9 of CPC to appoint an Advocate Commissioner. The learned II Additional Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil, vide impugned order, dated 12.08.2025, has dismissed the said application on the ground that the petitioner ha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
