Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.ANAND VENKATESH, J
N.Nagasubramanian Chettiar (Died) – Appellant
Versus
N.Vittal Rao (Died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputed ownership and tenant relationship. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. contrasting findings from trial and appellate courts. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. substantial questions of law concerning land classification. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. evidence required to assert ownership claims. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. the appeal's dismissal and conclusion. (Para 18) |
J U D G M E N T
This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed by the Principal Sub Court, Kumbakonam, in A.S.No.201 of 2005, dated 13.07.2006, reversing the judgment and decree passed by the Principal District Munsif, Valangaiman, in O.S.No.15 of 2002, dated
31.01.2003.
2. Heard Mr.S.Madhavan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants and Mr.R.Devaraj. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. The appellant is the plaintiff and the appellant filed the suit seeking for recovery of possession on the ground that the suit property was originally owned by his father, who purchased the same through a registered sale deed dated 18.10.1932 (Ex.A7). The suit property was originally a vacant site and later a superstructure was constructed. The father of the appellant died in the year 1974. Before
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
