Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Hemant Chandangoudar, J
Pon. Arun Prasad – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to government order restrictions on increments. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's m.phil qualifications and service history. (Para 3) |
| 3. arguments regarding past judgments and government compliance. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. court's reasoning aligning with fundamental rules. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. order for incremental adjustments as per eligibility. (Para 10) |
Order
The petitioner has challenged the proceedings issued by the first respondent in G.O.(1D) No.31, School Education (S.E.5(2)) Department, dated 12.02.2015, insofar as it relates to the grant of the second set of incentive increments only from 18.01.2013 in respect of the petitioner, as well as the consequential proceedings issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.021983/A1/2018 dated 24.10.2018.
2. The petitioner seeks to quash the said proceedings and for a consequential direction to the respondents to grant the second set of incentive increments for acquiring the M.Phil qualification from the day following the last date of examination while he was serving as Headmaster, High School, together with all consequential benefits.
3. The facts of the case, in brief, are as follows:
i) The petitioner was promoted to
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
