Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Advocates:
For the Appellant: Mr.S.M.A.Jinnah
For the Respondents: Mr.T.Senthil Kumar, Addl. Public Prosecutor for R2 to R5

The dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn indicates the court's acknowledgment of the petitioner's request to discontinue the legal action.

Headnote:This judgment involves a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a mandamus to release the petitioner's husband based on the Repatriation of Prisoners Act, 2003. The court found that permission to withdraw the petition was sought and granted, leading to a dismissal as withdrawn. The case centered on procedural matters rather than substantive legal issues.

(By G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J.)

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and also made an endorsement to that effect.

2.Permission granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :