Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
K.SURENDER, J
M.Sethupathy – Appellant
Versus
The Assistant Settlement Officer, Chepauk, Chennai - 600005 – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.7453 of 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court emphasized the necessity for compliance with procedural requirements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. dismissal issued due to non-compliance with court orders. (Para 4) |
O R D E R
On 11.12.2025, this Court has given a specific direction to the learned counsel for the petitioner to file the translated version of the documents, which are in the Tamil language, subject to a specific condition that in the event of failure to file such translated copy on the next date of hearing, this Writ Petition shall stand dismissed.
2. However, no translated copy has been filed. As a last chance, this Court, by order dated 17.02.2026, granted time to file the translated copy and directed that the case be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’.
3. Even thereafter, the translated copy has not been filed. The learned counsel for the petitioner again seeks time for filing the translated copy, though this Court has already granted time on two occasions.
4. Since the directions of this Court have not been complied with, this Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
