Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Dhanabal, J
Mohideen Pitchai – Appellant
Versus
M.H.Mohideen Bhava Rep By His Power of Attorney M.Mohamed Haneef – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fields of jurisdiction over property rights (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on the validity of plaintiffs' suit (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. observations on courtroom proceedings and evidence (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. legal standing and procedural propriety in civil suits (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. final judgment and dismissal of the suit (Para 17) |
JUDGMENT :
P. DHANABAL, J.
The Second Appeals are arising out of the Common Decree and Judgment passed by the learned VII Additional, City Civil Court, Chennai in Appeal Suit No.250 of 2013 and Cross Appeal No.182 of 2014 dated 08.10.2014.
2. The appellants are the defendants and the respondents are the plaintiffs, who filed the suit for the relief of permanent injunction and mandatory injunction and the trial court partly decreed the suit and granted permanent injunction from interfering with the plaintiffs possession and enjoyment of the common path way and dismissed the suit in respect of permanent injunction and mandatory injunction regarding ‘D’ schedule property and directed to remove the Slab-I. Aggrieved by the said Decree and Judgment, the plaintiffs have preferred the Appeal Suit in A.S.No.250 of 2013 and the defendan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
