IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Kandasamy – Appellant
Versus
The Director – Respondent
##PAGE1##
W.P.(MD)No.346 of 2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 05.03.2026
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
W.P.(MD)No.346 of 2026
Kandasamy ... Petitioner
vs.
1.The Director
Directorate of Town and Country Planning
2nd, 3rd and 4th floor
C and E Market Road
Koyembedu
Chennai 600 107
2.The Member Secretary
Thanjavur Local Planning Authority
No 5 Ganapathi nagar 2nd street
Medical college Road
Thanjavur 613 007 ... Respondents
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents
No. 1 and 2 to release the petitioner's land with an extent of 24.7
cents in Survey Number 188/1A situated in Miruthiyanja Padaiveedu
Village, Palavathankattalai, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District
treating the Palavanthankattalai Detailed Development Plan 4 as
lapsed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country
Planning Act, 1971.
For Petitioner :Mr.R.Karunanidhi
1/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 06:02:40 pm )
##PAGE2##W.P.(MD)No.346 of 2026
For Respondents :Mr.P.Subbaraj
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the
respondents 1 and 2 to release the petitioner’s land measuring an
extent of 24.7 cents in Survey No.188/1A, situated at Miruthiyanja
Padaiveedu Village, Palavanthankattalai, Kumbakonam Taluk,
Thanjavur District, by treating the Palavanthankattalai Detailed
Development Plan No.4 as lapsed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu
Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that though the petitioner’s
land was included in Palavanthankattalai Detailed Development Plan
No.4, the property has not been acquired till date and continues to
remain in the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner. It is further
contended that as per Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and
Country Planning Act, 1971, if the land reserved under a Detailed
Development Plan is not acquired within a period of three years from
the date of publication of the plan, such land shall be deemed to have
been released from the reservation. According to the petitioner, no
acquisition proceedings have been initiated within the prescribed
2/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 06:02:40 pm )
##PAGE3##W.P.(MD)No.346 of 2026
period of three years and therefore the reservation under the Detailed
Development Plan has lapsed.
3. I have considered the rival submissions and perused the
materials available on record.
4. This Court is of the view that it is not necessary to dwell upon
the entire factual matrix of the case, since with regard to the very
same Detailed Development Scheme, a Division Bench of this Court in
W.A.(MD) No.485 of 2020 has already held that the scheme had
lapsed by virtue of Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country
Planning Act. The relevant portion of the judgment reads as follows:
“11. As rightly pointed out by the learned counsel
appearing for the respondents/writ petitioners, the counter
affidavit proceeds on the merits of the claim and in no way
deals with the issue of deemed lapse. In the considered opinion
of this Court, the learned Judge, on correct appreciation of
facts and by applying the legal position as enumerated in the
above said judgment, allowed the writ petition. This Court, on
going through the reasons assigned in the impugned order, is
of the considered view that there is no infirmity or error
apparent on the face of the record for the reasons assigned by
the learned Single Judge for allowing the writ petition and
finds that the writ appeal lacks merits.
3/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 11/03/2026 06:02:40 pm )
##PAGE4##W.P.(MD)No.346 of 2026
12. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the
writ appeal filed by the official respondents in W.A.(MD) No.
340 of 2020, against the order dated 27.02.2017 in W.P.(MD)
No.14456 of 2014, was also dismissed on 02.03.2020.”
13. This Court has consistently held that if the land has
not been acquired wi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.