SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 22750

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M.DHANDAPANI
K.VANISTRI – Appellant
Versus
THE CHAIRMAN – Respondent



IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20-01-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.Nos.855 & 857 of 2026 K.Vanistri W/o S. Saravanan, No 9 Mullai Stree, TNSTC uzhiyar Nagar, Kandamanadi Village and post, Villupuram Taluk and District ..Petitioner(s)

Vs

1. The Chairman Joint Registrar of Cooperative Societies Common cadre Authortiy villupuram Region, Villupuram Villupuram district

2. The Administrator I.I 606, Arasur Prmary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society, Arasur Village and post, Thiruvennainallur Taluk Villupuram District

3. The Administrator E2136 Perumpakkam Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit society, Perumpakkam Village and Post, Villupuram Taluk Villupuram District ..Respondent(s)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka. 2563 / 2024 / Po.Pa.Ni.Ku dated 29.01.2025 and quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with back wages, attendant benefit and other monetary benefits.

For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondent(s): Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri Government Advocate for R2 and R3 Mr.S.Ravikumar Special Government Pleader for R1

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking quashment of the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1st Respondent in his proceedings in Na.Ka. 2563 / 2024 / Po.Pa.Ni.Ku dated 29.01.2025 and quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with back wages, attendant benefit and other monetary benefits.

2. Mr.E.P.Senniyangiri, learned Government Advocate takes notice on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3. Mr.S.Ravikumar, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents 2 and 3, and Mr.R.Bharanidharan, learned counsel takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. In view of the consent expressed by the learned counsel on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself.

3. The case of the petitioner is that she was appointed as Clerk in the concerned Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society in the year 1994. Thereafter, she was promoted as Senior Clerk in 2008 and subsequently, promoted as Secretary on 01.07.2020 and transferred to the second respondent society. After joining duty as Secretary, her pay scale was not fixed properly and salary was not disbursed accordingly. While she was discharging her duties in the second respondent society, she was placed under suspension on 26.07.2024 for a period of three months and charges were framed. However, subsistence allowance was not paid to her. Thereafter, without formally revoking the earlier suspension, she was transferred to the third respondent society and directed to join duty. Subsequently, vide proceedings in Na.Ka.No.2563/2024/Po.Pa.No.Ku, dated 29.01.2025, the first respondent once again placed the petitioner under suspension. Even thereafter, subsistence allowance was not paid. Though charge memo was issued and enquiry proceedings were initiated, no final order has been passed and subsistence allowance has not been disbursed. Aggrieved by the impugned suspension order dated 29.01.2025 and the continued non payment of subsistence allowance, the petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was appointed as Clerk in the year 1994, promoted as Senior Clerk in 2008 and further promoted as Secretary in 2020 and transferred to the second respondent society. He submitted that after joining duty as Secretary, the respondents did not properly fix the pay scale or pay salary. While the petitioner was discharging her duties on 26.07.2024, she was placed under suspension for a period of three months. However, the suspension was neither properly re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top