IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J
J.Nazira – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector/District Executive Magistrate, Kallakurichi District, Kallakurichi. – Respondent
Writ Petition|WMP Nos.8934,8935 and 8936 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. order dismissing the writ petition as infructuous. (Para 1) |
| 2. final conclusion of case implications. (Para 2) |
3. Ayishabee 4. Jahangeer ..Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings No. Na.Ka.A6/ 2463/2021 dated 25.11.2021 confirmed by 2nd respondent in his proceedings No. Na.Ka. A6/2247/2020 dated 14.12.2020 and quash the same and consequently direct the 1st and 2nd respondents to cancel all deeds subsequent order dated 14.12.2020.
For Petitioner: Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents: Mr.M.Mohammed Riyas (R3 and R4)
Mrs.S.Anitha (R1 and R2)
Special Government Pleader
ORDER
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the relief sought in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has made an endorsement to that effect.
2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the endorsement made, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.