SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 22828

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
Seven Hills PEB Systems Pvt. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
The Principal Secretary to Government, Revenue Department, Fort St.George, Chennai – 600 001. – Respondent
Writ Petition | W.P.(MD) No.12803 & 20504 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.G.Bala
For the Respondents: Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader

The court mandates the consideration of the petitioner's representations for refunding withheld funds, emphasizing timely administrative action.

Headnote:The Writ Petition seeks a Mandamus directing the respondents to refund 33.33% of the award amount withheld due to development charges. The petitioner contends that the deduction is illegal based on prior court orders and has not been considered timely. The Court finds no prejudice to the respondents in considering the representations and orders the respondents to act on petitioner's requests within 12 weeks.

Result: This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks refund due to perceived illegal deductions. (Para 1 , 2)
2. government pleader acknowledges the petition. (Para 3)
3. court directs action on the representation. (Para 4)
4. court's ruling to dispose of the petition with directions. (Para 5 , 6)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents 2 and 4 to refund 33.33% of the award amount deducted from the petitioner for the lands acquired from the petitioner on account of development charges.

2. According to the petitioner, the said deduction is erroneous and illegal in the light of the orders passed by this Court more fully disclosed in the petitioner’s representations dated 29.12.2025 and 07.01.2026. Since the aforesaid representations have not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

3. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

4. No prejudice will be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representations, as stated supra, are considered on merits and in accordance with law within a time frame fixed by this Court. The petitioner will have to necessarily satisfy the respondents with regard to limitation.

5. For the foregoing reasons, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the second respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representations dated 29.12.2025 and 07.01.2026 seeking for refund of 33.33% of the award amount which has been deducted by the respondents by way of development charges, which according to the petitioner is illegal in the light of the orders mentioned in the representations given by the petitioner, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J gm

6. This writ petition is disposed of with the above directions. No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top