SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 22832

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J
K.Durvasalu – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Greater Chennai Corporation – Respondent
Writ Petition



Important Points

A Writ of Mandamus can direct payment of due amounts, but interest claims must be pursued through civil courts.

Subject

Civil Law - Writ Jurisdiction

Headnote

The petitioner filed a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to direct the respondents to release Rs.3,23,47,358/- as per the accepted terms of work. The respondents agreed to pay the principal amount but contested the interest claim. The court directed the payment of the principal amount within four weeks, denying the interest claim, which must be pursued in civil court.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Doraisamy
For the Respondents: Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu

Table of Content
1. petition for payment of work completed. (Para 1)
2. acceptance of principal payment and denial of interest. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court directive on payment timeline. (Para 4)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the respondents to release the first part of the bill amount of Rs.3,23,47,358/- to the petitioner with interest for the work executed by the petitioner, which is more fully disclosed in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition based on the petitioner’s representations dated 30.12.2025 and 11.02.2026.

2. Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Learned Standing Counsel, on instructions, submits that insofar as the principal amount is concerned, the respondents are willing to pay the same to the petitioner within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, insofar as the interest claim made by the petitioner is concerned, he would submit that the same is not maintainable.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is also not pressing for payment of interest for the present through this writ petition.

4. Accordingly, this Court, after recording the undertaking given by the respondents that they shall pay a sum of Rs.3,23,47,358/- for the work done by the petitioner, which is more fully described in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition, directs the second respondent to pay the said sum to the petitioner within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. However, with regard to the claim for interest made by the petitioner is concerned, the same cannot be entertained by this Court in this writ petition. If at all, the petitioner is still seeking for payment of interest, he has to make a proper claim before the civil Court.

5. This writ petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top