Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J
Sridhar – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the basis for prosecution under the atrocities act. (Para 2) |
| 2. prior bail applications and their outcomes influence the current case. (Para 3) |
| 3. court’s observations on evidence and representation in court. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. counterarguments on the nature of charges and impact on bail decision. (Para 8) |
| 5. final decision to grant bail based on various considerations. (Para 9 , 10) |
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Sridhar ...Appellant Vs.
1. State rep. by the District Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam, Nagapattinam District.
2. State rep. by the Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Nagapattinam.
Crime No.18 of 2025
3. Sushma ...Respondents Criminal Appeal filed under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, seeking to allow the appeal and to set aside the order dated 13.02.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.79 of 2026 by the learned District and Sessions Judge, Nagapattinam and enlarge the appellant on bail, pending trial of the case in Spl.S.C.No.03 of 2025, on the file of the learned Principal District Judge, Nagapattinam.
For Appellant : Ms.K.Dhivyashree for Mr.M.Vijaya Ragavan For Respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
