Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI, CJ, G.ARUL MURUGAN, J
Sivaraj S/o.Late P.S.Chinnasamy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector Coimbatore District, Coimbatore – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's appeal regarding tender running rights. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's observations on compliance and tender process. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. clarification of legal obligations in tender participation. (Para 7) |
| 4. final ruling on the appeal. (Para 9) |
The writ petitioner has filed this appeal seeking to set aside the order dated 12.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.31020 of 2022.
2. The appellant herein filed two writ petitions. The prayers sought in the writ petitions are as under:
“W.P.No.31020 of 2022:
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the third respondent in Na.Ka.No.328/2021/Al (M) dated 25.08.2022 quash the same and further direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to run the shops as per communication dated 28.07.2021.
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the impugned undated tender notification in Na.Ka.No.2277/2020/MA1 by the second respondent for e-auction for the year 2022- 2023 – 2024-2024 for the platform shop Nos.27, 34 and 78
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
