IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Janaki – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Koombur Police Station, Dindigul District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual elements concerning the f.i.r. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court's decision on factual disputes. (Para 3) |
| 3. direction to conclude the investigation and the outcome of the petition. (Para 4 , 5) |
for R1 * * * * * ORDER The present petition has been filed by the accused Nos.1 to 4, to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.15 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent.
2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, it is a case and counter case, wherein the petitioners have lodged an F.I.R. in Crime No.14 of 2026, before the same police station and the same has not been taken into consideration. He further submits that the third petitioner was not in the scene of occurrence at all and she is living in Coimbatore.
3. The contentions raised by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners are factual in nature and the same cannot be considered for the purpose of quashing of the F.I.R. It is a subject matter of investigation.
4. In view of the above said facts, this Court is not inclined to quash the F.I.R. However, there shall be a direction to the first respondent police to complete the investigation and file a charge sheet within a period of three months from
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.