SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 22957

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.VIJAYAKUMAR, J
Janaki – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu, Rep. by the Inspector of Police, Koombur Police Station, Dindigul District. – Respondent
Crl.OP.(MD)No.4826 of 2026 | Crl.M.P(MD)No.5178 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M/s.K.Arunraj
For the Respondents:Mr.B.Thanga Aravindh Government Advocate(crl.side)

The court observed that factual disputes cannot be resolved at the quashing stage, directing the police to complete the investigation instead.

Headnote:This petition was filed under Section 528 of the BNSS Act to quash an F.I.R. in Crime No.15 of 2026. The petitioners contended that it was a case and counter case and that one petitioner was not present at the scene. The court found that the matters raised were factual and thus, declined to quash the F.I.R., directing the police to complete the investigation and file a charge sheet within three months. The petition was disposed of, and the related miscellaneous petition was closed.

Table of Content
1. factual elements concerning the f.i.r. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's decision on factual disputes. (Para 3)
3. direction to conclude the investigation and the outcome of the petition. (Para 4 , 5)

for R1 * * * * * ORDER The present petition has been filed by the accused Nos.1 to 4, to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.15 of 2026 on the file of the first respondent.

2. According to the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners, it is a case and counter case, wherein the petitioners have lodged an F.I.R. in Crime No.14 of 2026, before the same police station and the same has not been taken into consideration. He further submits that the third petitioner was not in the scene of occurrence at all and she is living in Coimbatore.

3. The contentions raised by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners are factual in nature and the same cannot be considered for the purpose of quashing of the F.I.R. It is a subject matter of investigation.

4. In view of the above said facts, this Court is not inclined to quash the F.I.R. However, there shall be a direction to the first respondent police to complete the investigation and file a charge sheet within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above said observations, this Criminal Original Petition stands disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top