Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.SATHISH KUMAR, M.JOTHIRAMAN, JJ
The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Limited – Appellant
Versus
V.Nagaraj – Respondent
W.A(MD)No.326 of 2026 | C.M.P(MD)No.3127 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court recognizes payment made to petitioner. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appeal dismissed as no further adjudication is needed. (Para 3) |
[Judgment of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
Challenging the order passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P(MD)No.4862 of 2023 dated 05.11.2024, whereby the Writ Court directed the appellants herein to issue a revised Pension Payment Order, the present Writ Appeal has been preferred.
2.When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned counsel appearing on either side submitted that the entire amount has already been paid to the respondent/writ petitioner and that nothing survives for adjudication in the present Writ Appeal.
3.Recording the said submission, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
