Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, P.DHANABAL, JJ
Rajammal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamilnadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims of illegal detention based on personal choices. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. court assessments on the detenu's ability to comprehend. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. direction issued for enquiry based on the petitioner's claims. (Para 9) |
(Order of the Court was made by N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.)
This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed for a direction to the respondent police to produce the detenu and to set him at liberty.
2. The petitioner is the mother of the detenu. In the affidavit, it is stated that the detenu is illegaly detained by the respondents 4 and 5, who are having criminal cases against them. According to the petitioner, her son had been forcibly taken away and the 4th and 5th respondents are in control of the detenu. A complaint was given in this regard to the 1st and 3rd respondents on 12.02.2026 and since no action was taken, the present petition was filed before this Court.
3. When the matter was taken up in the forenoon session, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the detenu has been brought to the Court and that on a preliminary enquiry, it is stated that the detenu is living along with his brother Malaichamy.
4. The learned counsel for th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
