SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 23184

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mrs. S.Srimathy, J
Aruljothi – Appellant
Versus
The Tahsildar Aravakurichi taluk Karur District – Respondent
WP(MD) NO. 6507 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Gokulraj
For the Respondents:Mr.S.Shanmugavel, Additional Government Pleader for R1 and R2, M/s.M.Aasha, Government Advocate (Crl.side) for R3

The Court held that an impugned order restricting a property survey was invalid, necessitating a proper inquiry and consideration of both parties’ claims.

Headnote:Statutory Analysis: The petition concerns a Writ filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India aiming to quash a prior order regarding property surveying proceedings. Facts of the Case: The petitioner contends that the impugned order bars surveying of the land despite the petitioner's representation for official intervention.

Findings of Court:
The court identified that the order was issued without adequate cognitive consideration.

Issues: The primary question framed by the court revolves around the legitimacy and justification of the impugned order restricting the survey of property pending litigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The reasoning emphasized that proper evaluation of parties' claims was necessary prior to enforcing any restrictions on land surveying, underscoring judicial obligation for impartial adjudication.

Result: This Writ Petition is allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks to quash an impugned order. (Para 1)
2. court finds the order was issued without proper consideration. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court mandates inquiry and survey to be completed timely. (Para 4)
4. writ petition allowed without costs. (Para 5)

Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned proceeding in Ref. No.2025/ 0123/14/005788, dated 11.10.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same as illegal and consequently direct the respondents to conduct survey and fix four boundaries of the petitioner's land comprised in survey Nos. 106/1B, 106/2A and 106/4A, situated at Vellampadi Village, Aravakurichi Taluk, Karur District, based on the petitioners representation dated 11.10.2025 within the stipulated time fixed by this Court and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to provide necessary police protection while conducting survey by the 1st and 2nd respondents.

ORDER

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the impugned proceeding in Ref. No.2025/ 0123/14/005788, dated 11.10.2025 passed by the 2nd respondent and consequently, to direct the respondents to conduct survey and fix four boundaries of the petitioner's land and consequently, to direct the 3rd respondent to provide necessary police protection while conducting survey by the 1st and 2nd respondents.

2.Through the impugned order, the respondents have stated that suit is pending regarding the disputed property and the 4th respondent herein has given an objection and therefore, survey cannot be conducted.

3.But the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the suit property is situated in Survey No.106/4C but the petitioner is seeking to survey the property situated in Survey Nos.106/1B, 106/2A and 106/4A.

4.Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the impugned order is passed without application of mind. Hence, the impugned order is quashed and the 1st respondent is directed to conduct an enquiry after issuing notice to the petitioner and the 4th respondent. Thereafter, the official respondents shall conduct a survey with the assistance of the second respondent. If need be, police protection may be sought by the official respondents. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With the above observations, this Writ Petition is allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. 11-03-2026 Tmg To

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top